If a title as abnormal as “Caprica” isn’t enough to attract your attention to SyFy’s newest series, then its promotional images of a half naked teenage girl certainly will. The highly anticipated prequel to Battlestar Galactica has finally reached primetime, and anyone expecting the same vast, post-apocalyptic, predominantly male setting of its predecessor is entirely mistaken.
Set 58 years before the events of the original series, this new interpretation revolves around the life—or lack thereof—of Zoey Graystone, an ambitious teenager whose journey begins on one of the distant twelve colonies in space, called “Caprica.” Immediately viewers are thrust into a world gripped with success, pleasure, and intensity, a product of which is the virtual world created by “holobands,” a device that enables its users to construct their own realities. These realities can be described as gruesome at best, involving hedonistic sacrificial rites and lewd sexual acts that go way beyond the capacity of your average modern-day PlayStation. Society is fixated on the madness involved in the holobands, consumed with obsession. Foreseeing the imminent chaos and wars that will eventually set the foundation for “Galactica,” Zoey, the daughter of the holoband’s creators, secretly uses the technology to literally clone herself into a separate virtual person, trapped within the holoband’s reality. Within the first twenty minutes of the pilot she sets out to another colony, presumably to carry out whatever plans she had to fix this wayward society with her clone, when unexpected disaster strikes, killing Zoey and an entire train full of people.
It is with this initiating event that the plot really begins to intrigue its viewers. First is the mystery of what Zoey ever planned to do with her technology in the first place. Immediately after is the uncertain fate of her trapped counterpart. This is the grab, the main concern that captivates the show’s audience as the action unravels: what necessarily constitutes life? While Zoey is irreversibly dead, can her copy ever fully replace her and her role in other peoples’ lives? And if this technology can truly revive her, does this justify bringing other people back from the dead as well? At the end of the pilot these unthinkable decisions are left in Zoey’s fathers’ hands, just a few of the many deep-seated issues the series explores even within the first forty minutes of its air.
To put it in perspective, this show is a lot like “Gossip Girl” with a brain. It has all the gimmicks and glamour of sleek design, brilliant skylines, and fast-paced action that hook its modern young adult audience, but also manages to hit on issues that transcend the supposed galaxies between us and the world of Caprica. Besides the concern involving the meaning of life, the show also explores the complexity of issues in race and religion. Across the twelve colonies exists discrimination that parallels the extremist views people still hold against each other today. In particular are the frequent remarks made about Taurons, inhabitants of one of the other eleven colonies, claiming that they are “dirt-eaters” and that “deceit is in their DNA”. Themes of discrimination are also prevalent in religion. The colony of Caprica believes in the existence of multiple gods, and the people are so fully invested in these beliefs that those few who practice monotheism are considered amoral and a terrorist threat. While this is hardly a situation we have ever encountered, the religious prosecution is also identifiable and relatable in a modern context.
While it seems that this sort of ethical and informational overload might deter its young audience, never fear, for these issues are made plenty more digestible when presented with ethereally beautiful girls in school uniforms and hunky researchers with dark, mysterious pasts. The other great appeal of this new series is that viewers can enjoy it with or without any prior knowledge of the series. Whereas “Galactica” was mainly aimed at a male audience, the director, Ronald D. Moore, claims that, “Everything in ‘Caprica’ was designed specifically not to repeat what we had done in ‘Galactica’.” By incorporating family drama and politics and good old-fashioned teenage angst, the show hooks plenty of new viewers, while at the same time staying true to its roots. Fans of the old series will be satisfied by getting to see the future Commander Adama of “Galactica” as a preteen, and watching the dark past “Galactica” references unfold as the colonies inevitably go to war.
While “Caprica” is certainly an unconventional take on a series that had previously been represented as straggling survivors in deep space, its intense, captivating pilot episode proves that it can hold its own in television, whether the viewers associate with its parent series or not. This show will leave a lasting impression that compels its viewers to tune in every week, Fridays at nine o’clock on the SyFy channel.
Emma,
ReplyDeleteI thought this was a really solid review. You gave a thorough but concise plot summary, and did a good job of integrating what would be the deeper themes of the series. I also liked that you compared the show to the old galactica, and also to gossip girls, both shows that readers of the reviews might be familiar with.
I really liked your take on the show, and I thought you did a really good job of representing all of its angles in an interesting way, which kept the reader engaged.
Emma, you made what may be an uninteresting genre of television/movies seem interesting to someone who steers clear of them in general. Well done. I am actually interested in this series now. You give a great summary of the series and make reading it enjoyable and easy. I feel like this review may be more summary than review though and could maybe use a bit more of it in the conclusion. You review little bits of it as you are writing the summary; maybe close out the review with a brief mention of these again.
ReplyDeleteEmma-
ReplyDeleteOutstanding review. Your voice was clear, and appropriate for the piece. Perhaps it might fit well into a newspaper? Your grammar, too, was solid, and lent to the ethos of the paper. I also thought you did a good job of ordering the sections to make them have the most impact. By providing us details about the plot before launching into a discussion of the themes. Perhaps, though, a reader might like to see the times it shows earlier on in the review. It would fit with the "inverted pyramid" thinking, I suppose, but your call.
The only thing that I can even remark on in a "constructive" light would be regarding some of your word choices. I've marked them on the paper, so I won't rehash them here, but I feel like it might flow a little more smoothly if you change them around.
All in all though, solid review. Well done.
-Jackson
Emma,
ReplyDeleteI just want to say that I feel your piece has energy. I remember you excitedly mentioning something about this show in class, and it seems to me that you have conveyed that emotion in this piece. I like how you relate the piece to reality, because I can see where viewers could automatically assume no relevance between a show with this particular plot and realistic issues.
Thank you for including the background information. I really have no idea of any reference you made in the review and this help me tremendously in understanding your piece. You also managed to strike my interest in the show. I feel like you would be able to reach viewers who have completely different tastes and experiences with this review because of the summary included in this piece.
Strong review!
Emma,
ReplyDeleteThis was a really great review. The voice is clear and it was really well written. I could see this in a newspaper or a more intellectual magazine's review section because of your style and vocabulary.
The first half of the article was a little confusing to me, maybe you could add a little more background about the first Battlestar Galactica because I don't really know anything about its plot besides that it's a science fiction show.
The second half of this review was a lot stronger for me. The paragraph that drew me in was the fourth one, where you describe all the different themes and questions the show raises. Also, I'm ashamed to admit that the Gossip Girl reference gave me a lot better picture of what this show was about, so it would probably succeed in doing that for a lot of other readers who otherwise would be unfamiliar with this show.
Your review made me interested in seeing this show, even though I have never heard of it before this, and that is a good sign of success in a review. I also like how you included a quote from the director which gives your review a lot more credibility.
Good Job!
Great job on this review because a) never having heard of Battlestar Galactica, b) or Caprica, or c) watching the SyFy channel, you intrigued me from the very beginning. You have done good job at maintaining your enthusiasm about the show throughout the entire piece. Through your descriptive language and impressive vocabulary, you maintain a positive opinion throughout the piece.
ReplyDeleteWhile finding myself a little lost in some parts, I recommend trying to relate a little more to the outsider reading this piece. The show sounds interesting but if you had a little more about the “original series” I think that you could appeal to audiences a little sooner than after a lengthy summary.
This review has gained my trust. Comparing the show to, something that for someone who doesn’t watch the SyFy channel might enjoy instead, Gossip Girl was clutch in giving a broader light on the series. I was also glad to read that the show’s unique plot includes realistic issues and not just “outer space” issues.
Overall, you have written a great review. Good job.
Emma i thought this was overall a really strong review. I have never had any interest in sy-fy what so ever but you gave really relatable and relative comparisons that made it a lot easier to understand the show. You did a really good job at making the review unbiased and objective even though you are clearly a fan.
ReplyDeleteSome sentences are a little bit wordy and long winded but i just think that is because you have so much great description and imagery that you are trying to include in the review. One of my favorite sentences was the comparison to gossip girl with a brain. As a huge GG fan myself, i actually have some incentive to watch this show now if not for the sy-fy action than for the young attractive angst filled teens.
I really liked this review all in all though, it had some really great qualities and with a little revision i think you can make it even better !
Emma,
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed your review. I think you did an amazing job at describing what the show was about and catching the readers attention.
I definitely wanted to watch the show after reading your review.
I do, however, have some suggestions as to how you can make the review easier to follow. As much as I appreciated the detail in which described the plot, I think you could use richer language that would make the summary more concise. There were a few run-on sentences that made the review a little confusing. I would also suggest that you insert more commentary. As previously mentioned, I enjoyed your comparison of the show to Gossip Girls and discussion on it's appeal to young teens. More of this type of commentary might make the review sound a little less like a report.
Like I said, overall I really enjoyed reading your review. It was definitely intriguing and I could tell you really enjoy the show.
Emma,
ReplyDeleteI actually hope that no one gets intrigued by half-naked teenage girls except other teenage boys...there is something not right about that I say this because you've written a very good plot summary and get deep into the background and likings of the show. This kind of suggests a more mature target audience that you are writing for. Unfortunately, I've also seen the show. It's very low budget quality, and I can understand you not mentioning the quality of the cinematics, if you are trying to persuade an audience to watch. Also, it is on the SyFy channel...
It's hard to convince someone who already has their opinion set in stone. Other than that, I actually liked the writing and your tone. It's a good review, but I'm reassured that I won't watch Caprica.
Emma,
ReplyDeleteVery strong and entertaining review. You have a distinct writing style and tone that is consistent throughout the piece, which aids in the review's strength. You did a nice job in describing and explaining the various aspects of the show from the plot, to the cinematography of the show.
I think this piece would work nicely in a syfy magazine, but may be harder to hit a general audience. That being said, your comparisons to other popular shows makes it a lot more relate-able to other audiences.
Good job!
-Maggee
Emma,
ReplyDeleteGood review, I like the intro. Seems like alot of fantasy will include scantily clad women to capture the eye - look at any RPG video-game box. The review is definitely passionate, any sci-fi fan that fits the target audience (teenager, girl especially?) would most likely give the show a shot.
My main concern is that the bulk of the review is background info, although most of it may be essential, it is alot. Some things I'd personally like to see addressed are esthetics; like Phillip said, part of sci-fi's draw is the quality of the image. What do you think the chances of the show surviving are? Was the pilot a successful launch in relation to other scy-fy pilots? Anything to add an objective view, if there isn't much negitive to say about it.
Emma,
ReplyDeleteBeing someone who has ZERO interest in these types of shows, you did a great job convincing me they may be worth checking out. This alone should signify a solid review.
This review is loaded with information. I don't think this is necessarily a fault because all of your information is relevant, but some pacing might help hone in the reader.
Overall, great review.
Emma,
ReplyDeleteWhen describing the setting of Caprica keep in mind that by saying its 58 years before the events of Battlestar Galactica will not exactly paint a picture to those not science fiction minded. What I especially liked about your description of the show is your comparison of it with “Gossip Girl,” this gives even those who have never watched anything from the science fiction genre a point of reference. You do a really good job at explaining both the context and content of the show, even the highly sophisticated gadgets i.e., the holoband (though it may help I’m highly acquainted with the Star Trek holo-deck). The review seems aimed toward a younger audience, I am curious then if there is any aspect of the show that might especially attract or deter an adult crowd? Overall an extremely comprehensive and pretty balanced review, good job.
Why did they change the "Sci Fi" channel to "SyFy?"